

The following indicators help you compare each scenario’s performance over the next couple of decades based on its impact on people, the economy, transportation and the community and environment. Each indicator is based on projections for the year 2030.
Tulsa’s future vitality depends a lot on its ability to grow. Each scenario performs differently in how it attracts newcomers to the city, instead of the suburbs.

Each scenario emphasizes a different mix of new kinds of housing.

But overall, each scenario would result in Tulsa remaining a city with a majority of single-family homes.

The City of Tulsa competes for jobs with the suburbs and other jurisdictions around it. Each scenario performs differently in how many new jobs Tulsa is able to attract.

Each scenario would stimulate a different amount of new construction investment in the city based on new growth.

Tulsa has historically dedicated almost all of its transportation investments to roads. Each scenario envisions a different emphasis on roads, transit, walking, and biking investments.

Like in most American cities, most Tulsans will still use their cars to get around. But the ease of using transit, walking or biking varies with each scenario.

Each scenario’s transportation investment priorities affect the length of time the average Tulsan will spend in their car.

Each scenario would add a different amount of new homes and students near existing public schools in the city.

The number of new residents living near parks, the river, and open space is different for each scenario.

Watch a presentation of additional scenario indicators:
<< Scenario D | Indicators | Scenarios at a Glance >>